Movie Review: Never Let Me Go

It is not often that you come home from a film feeling both defeated and genuinely happy. While these would appear to be contradicting emotions, that is exactly how I felt coming from Mark Romanek’s Never Let Me Go. The film, written by Alex Garland and based on the novel of the same name by Kazuo Ishiguro, is beautiful and emotionally devastating at the same time.

The film opens in the 1970’s, focusing on the lives of three school children in an English private school. Although at first sight the setting appears normal enough, we quickly discover these are not normal children, as they exist solely to have their organs harvested once they become adults.

Never Let Me Go seamlessly combines period drama and science fiction. The alternative reality we are shown is never fully explained nor needs to be. The film is purely about the three main characters: Kathy, Tommy and Ruth. It is the film’s deep focus on the emotions and personalities of the characters that makes it fascinating. The world they live in is simply there–reality for them–no explanations needed.

A film as personal as this relies heavily on the actors; and without their strong performances the film would have fallen flat. An Education‘s Carrie Mulligan stars as Abbie, a girl who does not act but rather observes. Andrew Garfrield plays Tommy, who Kathy has been in love with since they were children. Keira Knightley is provides the most surprising performance as Ruth, who jealously falls for Tommy. Fortunately, no one disappoints, in fact, they all exceed expectations. As these characters are shielded from normalcy, the performances we get portray them as innocents. This is especially true of Andrew Garfield, who plays Tommy as a naive, innocent teenager who wants nothing more than to live longer than he is programmed to. It is his performance that stands out, it is understated, but still emotionally heart wrenching.

The difficulty in reviewing this film for me comes from the emotional impact it had. Many films will tug at the heart strings, manipulating the audience into feeling a sadness that is not real. This film does not manipulate, it has a genuine sadness at its core that leaves you devastated. No film has left me on the verge of tears as much as this one has. In an age of formulaic films, it is utterly refreshing to see something so genuine on screen, even though the characters’ situations are foreign to the audience.

Alex Garland has often been criticized for his inability to write logical conclusions to his films. While I personally don’t agree with that, Never Let Me Go proves that wrong. The final act of the film doesn’t try to trick us into feeling for the characters as we already do. The characters reunite after years apart from each other; now, closer to the end, they spend what could be their last days together. There is no twist to the film, it ends exactly how we know it will, and that is where the sadness comes from. We know the fates of these characters, and the films’ focus is on their struggle to accept their fate just as we have had to.

Mark Romanek is a veteran music video director, and Never Let Me Go is only his second feature film, although you wouldn’t know it. Romanek shows a maturity and patience behind the camera that is not only rare for young filmmakers but for veteran ones as well. His use of focus leads to one of the most beautifully shot films of the year, if not the most.

Never Let Me Go is without a doubt my favourite film of the year, so far. It had the emotional impact that I usually judge a film’s quality on. The fact it is not being talked about more is truly a bewildering shame. I fear it will be forgotten, as dramas that do not garner Oscar attention usually do.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Movie Review and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Movie Review: Never Let Me Go

  1. Olivia says:

    I couldn’t agree more. This film left me heartbroken but in a way that I wish more films could. The reality these characters live in is quietly disturbing. I felt for each of them, but Andrew Garfield’s performance/character was the one that won’t leave me.

  2. Robin says:

    I didn’t like it at all. It didn’t feel like a movie to me. I didn’t get any sense of flow between scenes or how it all fit together into something bigger. I felt some of the emotional impact, but it was undone by my boredom about the movie. I realize it’s supposed to be a character study, but I didn’t get the sense of really getting to know the characters, and in hindsight I’m not exactly sure what was going on screen to fill 100 minutes. I also did not enjoy Garfield’s performance, neither here nor in The Social Network; he seems too stiff? Maybe he hasn’t had the right role yet. And speaking of The Social Network, I felt that was a much more effective character study, which used the narrative of the invention of facebook as a guide through the film.

  3. RunningSiren says:

    I really liked how the story was told and how it made sense within the context of the film. That is, these children (and I gather society in general as exhibited by the roles played by the adults) were not taught to question, their lives were taken care of completely, they had as much freedom to enjoy life that was necessary to grow into healthy adults. They were “loved” and cared for, even to the point where they were provided caregivers once they had to donate. I loved the cinematography and the use of colour throughout – very rich and comforting colours, even at the several scenes at the different beaches (which can be and are normally shown as grey and cold).
    Carrey Mulligan was excellent and for such a young actress certainly is worthy of these roles. Keira Knightley surprised me as being the selfish manipulative one. Andrew Garfield’s performance was the one that made me think – he was still a little boy inside waiting to grow up.
    “There is no twist to the film, it ends exactly how we know it will . . . ” – perfect description, and that’s what I liked about the film. I’m still not sure about the “science fiction” of it – yes, it’s an alternate reality, but there’s nothing sinister behind the characters (no secret aliens lurking around the corner).

  4. guy says:

    Even though I thought the book was miles better, it made for a pretty good movie. Slow… but good. Andrew Garfield’s performance was especially heartwrenching… what an actor.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s